Destruction, defibrillation and, er, Dodgson
COMIC COVER OF THE WEEK
"Rational romantic mystic cynical idealist"
COMIC COVER OF THE WEEK
Expert plate-spinning (water-treading?) from BF. The Axons, while brought to life surprisingly well in the audio medium, were ultimately dealt with too easily. Part 4's twist of a certain being's involvement in the alien invasion of Earth was spoilt by the fact I'd already seen the cover of the fourth box set - but that ain't Big Finish's fault. On to the finale!
Comfort reading you can smash in a sitting, as I did. Whenever I engage with "The Five Doctors" in any form, I'm reminded that Uncle Terrance was a grandmaster of both "Who" lore and clever plotting. Fellow Target novelisation fans will know what I mean when I say that every embellishment of what we saw on screen remains a tiny delight.
Often, the titles of these blog entries are just arrangements of words that tickled my fancy enough for me to write them down. Could be something I heard or read, or that just popped into my head. Might rhyme like that. Might not. Could be a Q. If I feel it's warranted, I'll wrap 'em in quote marks.
I have too many of these jottings at present. More than I can use. So I'm burning a bunch below, where they still won't be explained. That's right, this is a list of meaningless titles for never-to-be-written blogs! Aren't you lucky?
* Twenty-sided vice
* Umami hunter
* "There are still ghosts feasting at the table all these centuries later"
* Optimistically whistling the theme from "Minder"
* Pattern-matching machines
* The judge won't budge
* How many zen masters does it take to change a lightbulb?
* "She's a whole deck of wild cards"
* Keyclick symphony orchestra
* Robble, robble
* Canon of worms
* I flew to the wrong country
* Onion-wrapped Flying Dutchman
* "We watch the portraits watching us"
* Hoot and/or holler
* A Golden Age of Iron Age archaeology
On the latest episode of "The Doctor Who Show", in their regular series The List Makers (as opposed to "The Myth Makers", casuals), champion Aussie podders Rob and Dave presented their individual Top 5 "Who"-related autobiographies/biographies. It made me ponder mine. In no particular order, I'd go with:
* "Who On Earth Is Tom Baker?" by TB
* "Blue Box Boy" by Matthew Waterhouse (aka Adric)
* "Who And Me" by Barry Letts (producer)
* "Script Doctor" by Andrew Cartmel (script editor), AND
* "Still Getting Away With It" by Nicholas Courtney (aka The Brigadier).
Between them, the lads mentioned all five of those, although I believe NC's was a "just missed the cut" dealio. More interestingly, they both had at No. 1 on their list the bio "The Life And Scandalous Times Of John Nathan-Turner" by Richard Marson, which was later expanded and retitled "Totally Tasteless".
Based on their double rave, I am now on the hunt for a copy!
(I also realise I badly need to read some memoirs by women involved with the program. The above is a literary sausage party.)
Is it just me or are they trying harder - and getting raunchier - with the new season of "Rick & Morty", now exclusively on HBO Max?
Should I score this teen comedy 4.3/10? 3.4 would be closer to the truth. While the central romance is sweet, the lead actress has a million-dollar smile, Ken Jeong makes the most of a typical Ken Jeong role, and the cameos from KS alumni aren't unwelcome, the simple fact is it isn't funny. A sudden pro-wrestling move is perhaps the only genuinely amusing moment. I never bought the lead the actor. The situations mostly feel forced. Conversations lack that weirdly fascinating quality of Smith at his best. The fake cinema trailers and film-within-a-film are meh. The soundtrack is like the beginnings of a good soundtrack, but only the beginnings. Even the aforementioned cameos are kinda wasted. Basically, it needed a lot of rewriting and polishing. Don't listen to any John Hughes comparisons. "The 4.30 Movie" has none of the charm of a JH production, replacing it with crude humour I won't call "stoner humour" for fear of insulting stoners.
Disclaimer: It's currently averaging 6/10 on IMDb and 70% on Rotten Tomatoes, so clearly plenty of folks disagree with my assessment. If you're one of them, more power to ya. Maybe I'm just a grumpy old man.